A frequently mentioned alternative to the BCS is a "Plus-One" system that creates a four-team playoff.
This has the advantage of being implemented more easily into the existing system without extending the season excessively.
The disadvantages are considerable, however; perhaps the most glaring are that a plus-one system would do the little to provide
access to historically disadvantaged conferences or to consistently crown a widely accepted national champion.
| Criteria |
EBS |
4-Team Playoff |
| Crowns a definitive and widely accepted
national champion |
|
|
- EBS: A 12-team tournament ensures that
under most circumstances all teams worthy of an opportunity
to win a national championship are given that chance. The
"playoff" (one element of the EBS) is consistent with the
format used by every other NCAA team sport.
|
- 4-Team: While this allows for a greater
number of teams to battle for a national title, it is still
possible for more than four teams to deserve a shot at a national
title, as was demonstrated in 2004 when USC, Oklahoma, Auburn,
Utah, and Boise State were all undefeated. Distinguishing
between a worthy #4 team but unworthy #5 team will likely
prove difficult.
|
| Ensures BCS conference champions play in
premier bowl |
|
|
- EBS: All BCS conference champions are
ensured a spot in the 12-team EBS tournament.
|
- 4-Team: With six BCS conferences, not
all conference champions could be accommodated in the playoffs,
and some champions might have to play in minor bowls.
|
| Maintains traditional bowl affiliations
for conference champions |
|
|
- EBS: Teams receiving byes are placed
in bowls based on traditional bowl affiliations. However,
this allows for only one team to be placed per bowl and the
conference champion must be one of the four bye teams.
|
- 4-Team: Placing teams in traditional bowls
is impossible in a 4-team system where there is no guarantee
that the teams making the playoffs will have the appropriate
semifinal bowls in which to play.
|
| Provides access to non-BCS conference champions |
|
|
- EBS: The highest-ranked non-BCS conference
champion is guaranteed a spot in the post season.
|
- 4-Team: Scheduling and polling agency
bias make it nearly impossible for a non-BCS team to qualify
for such a tournament.
|
| Provides access to all teams worthy of
a chance at a national championship |
|
|
- EBS: With all six BCS conference champions,
at least one non-BCS conference champion, and potentially
five at-large bids, it is very unlikely that a team deserving
of a chance at the national title would be excluded.
|
- 4-Team: It is possible that more than
four teams are deserving of a chance at the national championship.
In addition to the five undefeated teams in the 2004 season,
in 1998 (the BCS’s first year of existence) eight teams in
the Top 25 had only one loss. Selecting teams worthy to play
in a four team playoff (or a two team playoff in the case
of the BCS) would cause justifiable controversy.
|
| Prevents unworthy teams from having a chance
at a national championship |
|
|
- EBS: With the possibility of a weak
conference champion and as many as five at-large bids, it
is possible a team with several losses would be included in
the tournament
|
- 4-Team: It is highly unlikely that any
of the top four teams in the country would be considered unworthy
|
| Maintains the importance of the regular
season for teams with the same number of losses as the #1 ranked
team (i.e., an undefeated team) |
|
|
- EBS: By making available first round
byes, even teams who have sewn up an EBS tournament berth still need
to maintain their standing as one of the top 4 teams.
|
- 4-Team: For a team seeking one of the
top four spots in the country, a late season loss could end
any hopes of a national title.
|
| Maintains the importance of regular season
games for teams with one or two more losses than the #1 ranked
team (i.e., one loss teams when the #1 team is undefeated). |
|
|
- EBS: Quality teams with only one or two
losses to top teams are still very much in the hunt for the
national championship. Although their path to a championship
is deservingly more difficult, for these teams, their regular
season is still “the most important regular season in collegiate
athletics.” Another loss would eliminate them from the tournament.
|
- 4-Team: While only one or two losses
might keep such a team in contention for a playoff spot, there
are years when there will be too many undefeated teams or
their rankings will be subject to voter bias and/or timing
of losses.
|
| Produces compelling matchups to attract
a national TV audience in majority of bowl games |
|
|
- EBS: By the very nature of a national
championship tournament and because of a lack of potentially
lopsided matchups, all games are compelling.
|
- 4-Team: By the very nature of a playoff
and because of a lack of potentially lopsided matchups, all
games are compelling.
|
| Advances the interest in minor bowl games |
|
|
- EBS: Because first round sites are hosted
by minor bowls, these bowls can leverage this added interest
to non-Tournament years. Non-tournament games get attention by
taking place during "bowl week," sandwiched between the first
round and the quarterfinals.
|
- 4-Team: A two round playoff cannot incorporate
minor bowls and only serves to draw attention from them.
|
| Allows fans to enjoy the complete bowl
experience |
|
|
- EBS: The byes and extended period between
first and second round games allow fans to travel to bowl
sites and enjoy extend stays. The later-round games will continue
to be “destination events” where fans attend regardless of
competing teams. In the current system, only about 1/3 of
tickets for many bowls go to schools; rest are allocated to
annual renewals, corporate partners, and local residents.
|
- 4-Team: With only two potential games
and first games with such importance, teams can travel to
first round games to enjoy the bowl experience, and then,
should their team win, still attend the finals.
|
| Student-athletes not subjected to excessive
number of games |
|
|
- EBS: Teams play at most four postseason
games, but given the fact that the highest-ranked, and presumably
best, teams receive a bye, teams expected to play in the championship
game would play at most three postseason games. At most a
team would play 16 games, similar to games played by national
champions in Division I-AA (15 games), Division II (15-16
games), and Division III (14-15). Unlike these division, those
at DI-A would benefit from a several week rest between the
regular season and the postseason.
|
- 4-Team: Teams play at most two postseason
games.
|