A 8-team playoff may resemble the "NFL-style playoff" feared by college football administrators.
There are two oft-mentioned qualifying mechanisms for an 8-team system. In one, the playoff includes the
top 8 ranked teams; such a system would not gaurantee access to BCS conference champions, thus devaluing the
regular season conference play for these teams. In the other proposed qualifying mechanism, 6 bids are reserved
for BCS conference champions and 2 for at-large teams. This method would fail to provide access to historically
disadvantaged (non-BCS) conferences. As seen, there are inherent problems with either format.
| Criteria |
EBS |
8-Team Playoff |
| Crowns a definitive and widely accepted
national champion |
|
|
- EBS: A 12-team tournament ensures that
under most circumstances all teams worthy of an opportunity
to win a national championship are given that chance. The
"playoff" (one element of the EBS) is consistent with the
format used by every other NCAA team sport.
|
- 8-Team: Like a 12-teams system, a well-structured playoff
with sufficient teams ensures worthy contenders are not denied
a chance at a national title. However, if automatic berths are given
to conference champions, there are situations in which worthy
teams can be excluded. For example, if 6 spots were reserved for BCS
conference champions, the undefeated Utah teams from 2004 and 2008
would have been excluded from the playoff.
|
| Ensures BCS conference champions play in
premier bowl |
|
|
- EBS: All BCS conference champions are
ensured a spot in the 12-team EBS tournament.
|
- 8-Team: All BCS conference champions
are ensured a spot in the playoffs.
|
| Maintains traditional bowl affiliations
for conference champions |
|
|
- EBS: Teams receiving byes are placed
in bowls based on traditional bowl affiliations. However,
this allows for only one team to be placed per bowl and the
conference champion must be one of the four bye teams.
|
- 8-Team: Like a 12-team playoff, higher
seeded teams could be given preference in the bowls which
they play, but conference champions with lower seedings could
not.
|
| Provides access to non-BCS conference champions |
|
|
- EBS: The highest-ranked non-BCS conference
champion is guaranteed a spot in the post season.
|
- 8-Team: With six of the eight spots going
to BCS conference champions, only two at-large spots remain
for non-BCS conference champions to qualify. In 2004, a 6th
ranked Utah team would not have qualified as the at-large
spots would have gone to #4 Texas and #5 California.
|
| Provides access to all teams worthy of
a chance at a national championship |
|
|
- EBS: With all six BCS conference champions,
at least one non-BCS conference champion, and potentially
five at-large bids, it is very unlikely that a team deserving
of a chance at the national title would be excluded.
|
- 8-Team: Even with the expanded field,
the inclusion of conference champions means there are only
two at-large spots. In a year with a few particularly strong
conferences, it is possible that more than two non-conference
champions are strong enough to be considered in the field.
|
| Prevents unworthy teams from having a chance
at a national championship |
|
|
- EBS: With the possibility of a weak
conference champion and as many as five at-large bids, it
is possible a team with several losses would be included in
the tournament
|
- 8-Team: Although there are only two
at-large bids, the possibility of a weak conference champion
could result in a team with several regular season losses
contending for a national title
|
| Maintains the importance of the regular
season for teams with the same number of losses as the #1 ranked
team (i.e., an undefeated team) |
|
|
- EBS: By making available first round
byes, even teams who have sewn up an EBS tournament berth still need
to maintain their standing as one of the top 4 teams.
|
- 8-Team: With the only guaranteed invitations
going to conference champions, a late season conference loss
could not only cost the team a conference title, but could
drop a previously undefeated team into the pool of one-loss
teams seeking an at-large bid and could cost them a spot in
the playoffs.
|
| Maintains the importance of regular season
games for teams with one or two more losses than the #1 ranked
team (i.e., one loss teams when the #1 team is undefeated). |
|
|
- EBS: Quality teams with only one or two
losses to top teams are still very much in the hunt for the
national championship. Although their path to a championship
is deservingly more difficult, for these teams, their regular
season is still “the most important regular season in collegiate
athletics.” Another loss would eliminate them from the tournament.
|
- 8-Team: All teams in contention for either
a conference title or at-large spot still have meaningful
regular season games from a national championship perspective.
|
| Produces compelling matchups to attract
a national TV audience in majority of bowl games |
|
|
- EBS: By the very nature of a national
championship tournament and because of a lack of potentially
lopsided matchups, all games are compelling.
|
- 8-Team: By the very nature of a playoff
and because of a lack of potentially lopsided matchups, all
games are compelling.
|
| Advances the interest in minor bowl games |
|
|
- EBS: Because first round sites are hosted
by minor bowls, these bowls can leverage this added interest
to non-Tournament years. Non-tournament games get attention by
taking place during "bowl week," sandwiched between the first
round and the quarterfinals.
|
- 8-Team: A three round playoff can only
promote two minor bowls and will only serve to draw attention
from the remaining bowls.
|
| Allows fans to enjoy the complete bowl
experience |
|
|
- EBS: The byes and extended period between
first and second round games allow fans to travel to bowl
sites and enjoy extend stays. The later-round games will continue
to be “destination events” where fans attend regardless of
competing teams. In the current system, only about 1/3 of
tickets for many bowls go to schools; rest are allocated to
annual renewals, corporate partners, and local residents.
|
- 8-Team: Since the quarterfinal games
will likely begin on Jan. 1, fans can still travel and enjoy
the bowl experience for these games, but later games will
require more travel and shorter stays.
|
| Student-athletes not subjected to excessive
number of games |
|
|
- EBS: Teams play at most four postseason
games, but given the fact that the highest-ranked, and presumably
best, teams receive a bye, teams expected to play in the championship
game would play at most three postseason games. At most a
team would play 16 games, similar to games played by national
champions in Division I-AA (15 games), Division II (15-16
games), and Division III (14-15). Unlike these division, those
at DI-A would benefit from a several week rest between the
regular season and the postseason.
|
- 8-Team: Teams play at most three postseason
games.
|